Skip to content

ci: skip most CI checks if title contains citest skip [citest_skip]#484

Merged
richm merged 2 commits intomainfrom
citest_skip
Feb 4, 2026
Merged

ci: skip most CI checks if title contains citest skip [citest_skip]#484
richm merged 2 commits intomainfrom
citest_skip

Conversation

@richm
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@richm richm commented Feb 3, 2026

When we submit a PR for a CI update or docs, we do not want to start CI checking
for ansible-lint, qemu, etc. When we are doing CI updates to 30 or more
roles, this fires off a lot of unnecessary tests, which sometimes causes the
linux-system-roles org in github to be throttled.

When submitting a PR that can skip ci, use "[citest_skip]" in the PR title.

@richm richm self-assigned this Feb 3, 2026
@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

sourcery-ai bot commented Feb 3, 2026

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Configures most GitHub Actions jobs to be conditionally skipped when a pull request title contains the marker "[citest_skip]" to avoid running heavy CI pipelines for CI/docs-only changes.

Sequence diagram for PR event and conditional CI job execution

sequenceDiagram
  actor Developer
  participant GitHub as GitHub_Repo
  participant Actions as GitHub_Actions
  participant Workflow as CI_Workflow
  participant Job as CI_Job

  Developer->>GitHub: Create or update PR with title
  GitHub-->>Actions: Emit pull_request event
  Actions->>Workflow: Start workflow evaluation
  Workflow->>Workflow: Read github.event.pull_request.title
  Workflow->>Workflow: Evaluate condition !contains(title, [citest_skip])
  alt Title does not contain [citest_skip]
    Workflow->>Job: Schedule CI job execution
    Job-->>Workflow: Run checks (lint, spelling, etc.)
  else Title contains [citest_skip]
    Workflow-->>Job: Do not start job (skipped)
  end
  Workflow-->>Actions: Report job status to GitHub
  Actions-->>Developer: Display CI results on PR
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Gate all major CI GitHub Actions jobs on a PR-title flag to allow skipping heavy checks.
  • Add an if: "!contains(github.event.pull_request.title, '[citest_skip]')" condition to the ansible_lint job so it only runs when the PR title does not include the skip marker.
  • Add the same title-based if condition to the ansible_managed_var_comment job to skip it on citest-only PRs.
  • Apply the title-based if condition to the ansible_test job to avoid running the full Ansible test suite when skipping CI.
  • Guard the codespell job with the title-based if condition to skip spelling checks when requested.
  • Guard the markdownlint job with the title-based if condition to skip markdown linting when requested.
  • Guard the scenario job in the qemu-kvm-integration-tests workflow with the title-based if condition to skip integration tests when requested.
  • Guard the test_converting_readme job with the title-based if condition to avoid running README conversion tests when skipping CI.
  • Guard the woke job with the title-based if condition to skip non-inclusive language checks on citest-only PRs.
.github/workflows/ansible-lint.yml
.github/workflows/ansible-managed-var-comment.yml
.github/workflows/ansible-test.yml
.github/workflows/codespell.yml
.github/workflows/markdownlint.yml
.github/workflows/qemu-kvm-integration-tests.yml
.github/workflows/test_converting_readme.yml
.github/workflows/woke.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've left some high level feedback:

  • To make the condition more explicit and robust for non-PR events, consider changing the job-level if to something like if: github.event_name != 'pull_request' || !contains(github.event.pull_request.title, '[citest_skip]') so that pushes and other event types are clearly unaffected and not relying on contains handling null.
  • Relying on a magic string in the PR title can be fragile (typos, different casing, etc.); you might want to consider using a dedicated PR label (and checking github.event.pull_request.labels) instead, which is easier to enforce via tooling or repository conventions.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- To make the condition more explicit and robust for non-PR events, consider changing the job-level `if` to something like `if: github.event_name != 'pull_request' || !contains(github.event.pull_request.title, '[citest_skip]')` so that pushes and other event types are clearly unaffected and not relying on `contains` handling null.
- Relying on a magic string in the PR title can be fragile (typos, different casing, etc.); you might want to consider using a dedicated PR label (and checking `github.event.pull_request.labels`) instead, which is easier to enforce via tooling or repository conventions.

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

When we submit a PR for a CI update or docs, we do not want to start CI checking
for ansible-lint, qemu, etc.  When we are doing CI updates to 30 or more
roles, this fires off a lot of unnecessary tests, which sometimes causes the
linux-system-roles org in github to be throttled.

When submitting a PR that can skip ci, use "[citest_skip]" in the PR title.

Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com>
When we submit a PR for a CI update or docs, we do not want to start CI checking
for ansible-lint, qemu, etc.  When we are doing CI updates to 30 or more
roles, this fires off a lot of unnecessary tests, which sometimes causes the
linux-system-roles org in github to be throttled.

When submitting a PR that can skip ci, use "[citest_skip]" in the PR title.

Signed-off-by: Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com>
@richm richm merged commit 7cc8968 into main Feb 4, 2026
10 checks passed
@richm richm deleted the citest_skip branch February 4, 2026 13:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant