Skip to content

Conversation

@cdoern
Copy link
Collaborator

@cdoern cdoern commented Dec 16, 2025

What does this PR do?

image_name seems like a misnomer, typically image_name is just the name of the distribution, the config file, or providers-run. This should probably not be called an image_name

@meta-cla meta-cla bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Meta Open Source bot. label Dec 16, 2025
@cdoern cdoern force-pushed the image_name branch 3 times, most recently from 6fed7ac to c5e9806 Compare December 16, 2025 16:09
image_name seems like a misnomer, typically image_name is just the name of the distribution, the config file, or providers-run. This should probably not be called an `image_name`

Signed-off-by: Charlie Doern <cdoern@redhat.com>
Copy link
Collaborator

@leseb leseb left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wondering if we should continue to expose image_name but set deprecated in the Pydantic Field. 🤔 - we can still recommend distro_name as the new name though for all the templates.

@leseb
Copy link
Collaborator

leseb commented Jan 6, 2026

@cdoern are you planning to address #4396 (review)? thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Meta Open Source bot.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants