Skip to content

bump dependencies#18

Merged
dlipicar merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
support-non-local-remote-transports
May 7, 2026
Merged

bump dependencies#18
dlipicar merged 2 commits into
masterfrom
support-non-local-remote-transports

Conversation

@dlipicar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 26, 2026 21:23
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the Nix flake inputs/lockfile to pull newer Logos dependencies, switching several top-level inputs to the support-non-local-remote-transports branch.

Changes:

  • Point logos-module-builder, logos-liblogos, and logos-logoscore-cli flake inputs at the support-non-local-remote-transports branch.
  • Refresh flake.lock with new rev/narHash (and ref) entries for the updated inputs and related transitive dependencies.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
flake.nix Switches several top-level flake inputs to a feature branch.
flake.lock Updates pinned commits/hashes (and adds ref) for the bumped inputs and transitive dependencies.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment thread flake.nix Outdated
Comment thread flake.nix Outdated
@dlipicar dlipicar force-pushed the support-non-local-remote-transports branch 3 times, most recently from a77a3c6 to 2b23a49 Compare April 29, 2026 17:29
@dlipicar dlipicar force-pushed the support-non-local-remote-transports branch 4 times, most recently from 8f7efa4 to 1f0677d Compare May 7, 2026 19:43
@dlipicar dlipicar force-pushed the support-non-local-remote-transports branch from 1f0677d to 955c251 Compare May 7, 2026 21:34
@dlipicar dlipicar merged commit 029d1c3 into master May 7, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants