V0.2

[chnlkw]

Added

• Added AsyncRead/AsyncWrite support for Tag and Stream (requires utils feature flag)
• Added connect_addr_vec function to Worker

Changed

• Updated to UCX 1.18 with latest API compatibility
• Updated multiple dependency versions
• Migrated to Rust 2021 edition

Fixed

• Fixed various bugs and issues

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR bumps the crate to version 0.2.0, adds raw‐byte address connection support, and introduces full AsyncRead/AsyncWrite streams for tag- and stream-based communication under a new util feature.

• Added Worker::connect_addr_vec for connecting via raw address bytes
• Introduced WriteStream, ReadStream, TagWriteStream, and TagReadStream in endpoint/util.rs
• Refactored request handling with a RequestParam builder and unified Status<T> abstraction

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 15 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File	Description
ucx1-sys/ucx	Updated submodule commit for UCX 1.18 compatibility
src/ucp/worker.rs	Added connect_addr_vec and trace in Drop for WorkerAddress
src/ucp/endpoint/util.rs	Added AsyncRead/AsyncWrite stream wrappers with todo!() stubs
src/lib.rs	Impl Into<std::io::Error> for Error mappings

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

src/ucp/worker.rs:126

• [nitpick] The name connect_addr_vec and its doc comment are vague about the expected format of addr. Consider clarifying that this slice should come from worker.get_address() or rename to connect_addr_bytes to better convey its purpose.

    pub fn connect_addr_vec(self: &Rc<Self>, addr: &[u8]) -> Result<Endpoint, Error> {

src/ucp/worker.rs:126

• There are no tests covering the new connect_addr_vec method. Consider adding a unit or integration test to verify connections via raw address bytes.

    pub fn connect_addr_vec(self: &Rc<Self>, addr: &[u8]) -> Result<Endpoint, Error> {

src/lib.rs:173

• The variant NoReource looks misspelled—should it be NoResource? Please confirm the correct spelling of this error variant.

            Error::NoReource => WouldBlock,

[wangrunji0408]

LGTM! Please resolve the issues mentioned by Copilot 😄

[chnlkw]

LGTM! Please resolve the issues mentioned by Copilot 😄

Thanks a lot. Code updated