-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
Clean up #588
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clean up #588
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request involves a series of minor modifications across multiple components in the admin section of the application. The changes primarily focus on removing comments and simplifying code in various React components related to login, messaging, membership, and product management. While most components retain their original functionality, there are subtle adjustments in state management and payload handling in some files, particularly in the Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (11)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (5)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
41e351e to
aff8d68
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
admin/src/Components/Login.jsx (1)
7-8: Ensure security and clarity around managing credentials in state.Storing credentials in React state is common practice for controlled components, but be mindful that these values are stored in memory. If additional measures are needed for security (for example, clearing the state after login attempts or encrypting sensitive data in local/session storage), consider implementing them.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
admin/src/Components/CollectionTable.js(1 hunks)admin/src/Components/Login.jsx(3 hunks)admin/src/Components/MessageForm.jsx(2 hunks)admin/src/Components/RequestPasswordReset.jsx(1 hunks)admin/src/Membership/MemberBox.jsx(0 hunks)admin/src/Membership/MemberBoxGroups.js(1 hunks)admin/src/Membership/MemberBoxSpans.jsx(0 hunks)admin/src/Membership/MemberExport.jsx(0 hunks)admin/src/Membership/MembershipPeriodsInput.js(1 hunks)admin/src/Messages/MessageAdd.js(0 hunks)admin/src/Messages/MessageShow.js(0 hunks)admin/src/Sales/ProductEdit.jsx(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (5)
- admin/src/Membership/MemberBox.jsx
- admin/src/Messages/MessageAdd.js
- admin/src/Membership/MemberBoxSpans.jsx
- admin/src/Messages/MessageShow.js
- admin/src/Membership/MemberExport.jsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- admin/src/Sales/ProductEdit.jsx
- admin/src/Components/RequestPasswordReset.jsx
- admin/src/Components/MessageForm.jsx
🔇 Additional comments (5)
admin/src/Components/Login.jsx (2)
39-40: Properly implemented controlled input for username.
This is a good implementation of a controlled component. The value is taken from state, and onChange restores the latest input to state.
53-54: Correct handling of password as a controlled input.
Matches best practices for managing form state in React. Ensure you clear this state upon logout or failed login if you want to enhance security further.
admin/src/Membership/MembershipPeriodsInput.js (1)
84-84: Confirm endpoint requirements for empty payload.
Currently, the post request is sending an empty payload ({}). If the endpoint expects data in the request body, this might break the intended functionality. Please verify whether sending an empty object satisfies the endpoint's requirements or if additional data must be included.
Use the following script to locate all references to "/webshop/member/" in the codebase and review how this endpoint is used elsewhere, ensuring that no required fields are omitted:
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for the backend implementation to verify the endpoint requirements.
Empty payload is correct for this endpoint
The backend implementation shows that the ship_labaccess_orders endpoint doesn't require any request body data. The function only takes the member_id parameter from the URL path and processes pending lab access orders for that member. The empty payload {} in the frontend request is appropriate.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search across the codebase for references to the "ship_labaccess_orders" endpoint
rg -A 10 $'/webshop/member/[^/]+/ship_labaccess_orders'
Length of output: 1875
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the backend implementation of the ship_labaccess_orders endpoint
rg -l "ship_labaccess_orders"
# Search for any route definitions or views related to this endpoint
ast-grep --pattern 'def ship_labaccess_orders'
Length of output: 216
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the implementation in the backend files
rg -A 10 "ship_labaccess_orders" api/src/shop/views.py api/src/shop/transactions.py
Length of output: 2334
admin/src/Membership/MemberBoxGroups.js (1)
100-100: Consider handling removal failures.
The simplified one-line removal call is great. However, if the removal fails (e.g., network issue), it should be handled—currently, errors won't be reported, potentially leaving state out of sync. Consider adding a .catch(...) block or error handling to ensure robust UI feedback in case of failures.
admin/src/Components/CollectionTable.js (1)
14-21: Destructuring props in the function signature is a clean approach.
This updated signature improves readability and reduces the need for extra prop unpacking within the component. It looks good.
aff8d68 to
03ce905
Compare
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Logincomponent to useuseStatefor controlled input componentsMemberBoxGroupscomponentChores