Skip to content

fix: handle None return from get_container_runtime()#159

Open
Rahuldrabit wants to merge 2 commits intomicrosoft:mainfrom
Rahuldrabit:fix/container-runtime-none-check
Open

fix: handle None return from get_container_runtime()#159
Rahuldrabit wants to merge 2 commits intomicrosoft:mainfrom
Rahuldrabit:fix/container-runtime-none-check

Conversation

@Rahuldrabit
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Fixes a TypeError crash that occurred when running network_delay and other chaos mesh injection tasks immediately after cluster creation.

Problem

The get_container_runtime() method was returning None when called before any Kubernetes nodes reached "Ready" state. This caused:

TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable

at line 30 in inject_symp.py when checking if 'docker' in container_runtime.

Solution

  1. Added retry logic to get_container_runtime(): Waits up to 60 seconds (configurable) for at least one node to become Ready
  2. Added explicit None check in SymptomFaultInjector.__init__(): Provides clear error message if container runtime cannot be detected

Testing

  • Verified the fix by running network_delay_hotel_res-detection-1 task
  • Task now successfully proceeds past initialization instead of crashing

Affected Tasks

All chaos mesh-based fault injection tasks including:

  • network_delay
  • pod_failure
  • pod_kill
  • network_loss
  • container_kill

Checklist

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Tested locally
  • Code follows project style guidelines

The get_container_runtime() method was returning None when called
immediately after cluster creation, before any nodes reached Ready state.
This caused a TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable
when the code tried to check if 'docker' was in the runtime string.

Changes:
- Add retry logic with 60s timeout to get_container_runtime() to wait
  for at least one node to become Ready
- Add explicit None check in SymptomFaultInjector.__init__() with
  a clear error message if container runtime cannot be detected

Fixes network_delay, pod_failure, and other chaos mesh injection tasks
that were crashing on initialization.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 4, 2026 09:56
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR prevents chaos-mesh fault injection tasks from crashing during early cluster startup by making container runtime detection resilient to clusters with no Ready nodes yet.

Changes:

  • Add polling/retry behavior to KubeCtl.get_container_runtime() to wait for a Ready node before reading its runtime.
  • Add an explicit None check in SymptomFaultInjector.__init__() to raise a clearer error instead of triggering a TypeError.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
aiopslab/service/kubectl.py Adds bounded retry logic for detecting container runtime from a Ready node.
aiopslab/generators/fault/inject_symp.py Validates runtime detection result and raises a clear error when unavailable.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

Comment on lines +69 to +76
elapsed = 0
while elapsed < max_wait:
for node in self.core_v1_api.list_node().items:
for status in node.status.conditions:
if status.type == "Ready" and status.status == "True":
return node.status.node_info.container_runtime_version
time.sleep(poll_interval)
elapsed += poll_interval
Copy link

Copilot AI Apr 4, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The retry loop can exceed max_wait when poll_interval is larger than the remaining time (e.g., max_wait=1, poll_interval=10 will still sleep 10s). Consider using a monotonic deadline and sleeping min(poll_interval, remaining) (or validating/clamping poll_interval) so max_wait is an actual upper bound.

Suggested change
elapsed = 0
while elapsed < max_wait:
for node in self.core_v1_api.list_node().items:
for status in node.status.conditions:
if status.type == "Ready" and status.status == "True":
return node.status.node_info.container_runtime_version
time.sleep(poll_interval)
elapsed += poll_interval
deadline = time.monotonic() + max_wait
while time.monotonic() < deadline:
for node in self.core_v1_api.list_node().items:
for status in node.status.conditions:
if status.type == "Ready" and status.status == "True":
return node.status.node_info.container_runtime_version
remaining = deadline - time.monotonic()
if remaining <= 0:
break
time.sleep(min(poll_interval, remaining))

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be an extreme case but a good practice

Comment on lines +70 to +76
while elapsed < max_wait:
for node in self.core_v1_api.list_node().items:
for status in node.status.conditions:
if status.type == "Ready" and status.status == "True":
return node.status.node_info.container_runtime_version
time.sleep(poll_interval)
elapsed += poll_interval
Copy link

Copilot AI Apr 4, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The docstring says this returns None when no Ready node is found, but self.core_v1_api.list_node() can raise (e.g., transient API errors / auth / connectivity) and will currently break out of the retry loop immediately. Either update the docstring to document the possible exception(s), or catch/log exceptions during polling and continue until the deadline (similar to wait_for_ready).

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point. We should catch exceptions and update docstrings

@Rahuldrabit
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

before fix
15:35:56 [graphrca.aiopslab] INFO [AIOpsLab] Task type: detection Traceback (most recent call last): ... TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable

after fix
15:47:18 [graphrca.aiopslab] INFO [AIOpsLab] Task type: detection Session ID: 411a10b5-245b-4070-83ad-644d74bf1b27 Namespace test-hotel-reservation already exists. ... == Helm Install == NAME: chaos-mesh ... [task continues successfully]

Address Copilot AI review feedback:

1. Fix timing precision: Use time.monotonic() deadline and sleep only
   remaining time to ensure max_wait is an actual upper bound.
   Previous implementation could exceed max_wait by up to poll_interval.

2. Add exception handling: Catch transient API errors during polling
   and continue retrying until deadline, similar to wait_for_ready().
   Log warnings for persistent errors.

3. Update docstring to document exception handling behavior.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@Rahuldrabit
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Rahuldrabit commented Apr 4, 2026

Timing precision fixed: Switched to time.monotonic() with deadline-based logic and sleep(min(poll_interval, remaining)) to ensure max_wait is a hard upper bound.

Exception handling added: Now catching transient API errors (connectivity, auth, etc.) and continuing to retry until deadline, similar to the existing wait_for_ready() pattern. Persistent errors are logged as warnings.

Updated the docstring to document the exception handling behavior. Changes pushed in commit fbfa9f5.

@gaganso
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

gaganso commented Apr 5, 2026

Hi @Rahuldrabit , thanks for this PR! It looks great (I commented on the copilot review without realizing you have already addressed them.

  1. Can you please agree to the Contributor License Agreement - fix: handle None return from get_container_runtime() #159 (comment)?
  2. Do you know why the aiopslab-applications files are part of the PR?

@Rahuldrabit
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Rahuldrabit please read the following Contributor License Agreement(CLA). If you agree with the CLA, please reply with the following information.

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree [company="{your company}"]

Options:

  • (default - no company specified) I have sole ownership of intellectual property rights to my Submissions and I am not making Submissions in the course of work for my employer.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree
  • (when company given) I am making Submissions in the course of work for my employer (or my employer has intellectual property rights in my Submissions by contract or applicable law). I have permission from my employer to make Submissions and enter into this Agreement on behalf of my employer. By signing below, the defined term “You” includes me and my employer.
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree company="Microsoft"

Contributor License Agreement

Contribution License Agreement

This Contribution License Agreement (“Agreement”) is agreed to by the party signing below (“You”), and conveys certain license rights to Microsoft Corporation and its affiliates (“Microsoft”) for Your contributions to Microsoft open source projects. This Agreement is effective as of the latest signature date below.

  1. Definitions.
    “Code” means the computer software code, whether in human-readable or machine-executable form,
    that is delivered by You to Microsoft under this Agreement.
    “Project” means any of the projects owned or managed by Microsoft and offered under a license
    approved by the Open Source Initiative (www.opensource.org).
    “Submit” is the act of uploading, submitting, transmitting, or distributing code or other content to any
    Project, including but not limited to communication on electronic mailing lists, source code control
    systems, and issue tracking systems that are managed by, or on behalf of, the Project for the purpose of
    discussing and improving that Project, but excluding communication that is conspicuously marked or
    otherwise designated in writing by You as “Not a Submission.”
    “Submission” means the Code and any other copyrightable material Submitted by You, including any
    associated comments and documentation.
  2. Your Submission. You must agree to the terms of this Agreement before making a Submission to any
    Project. This Agreement covers any and all Submissions that You, now or in the future (except as
    described in Section 4 below), Submit to any Project.
  3. Originality of Work. You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your original work.
    Should You wish to Submit materials that are not Your original work, You may Submit them separately
    to the Project if You (a) retain all copyright and license information that was in the materials as You
    received them, (b) in the description accompanying Your Submission, include the phrase “Submission
    containing materials of a third party:” followed by the names of the third party and any licenses or other
    restrictions of which You are aware, and (c) follow any other instructions in the Project’s written
    guidelines concerning Submissions.
  4. Your Employer. References to “employer” in this Agreement include Your employer or anyone else
    for whom You are acting in making Your Submission, e.g. as a contractor, vendor, or agent. If Your
    Submission is made in the course of Your work for an employer or Your employer has intellectual
    property rights in Your Submission by contract or applicable law, You must secure permission from Your
    employer to make the Submission before signing this Agreement. In that case, the term “You” in this
    Agreement will refer to You and the employer collectively. If You change employers in the future and
    desire to Submit additional Submissions for the new employer, then You agree to sign a new Agreement
    and secure permission from the new employer before Submitting those Submissions.
  5. Licenses.
  • Copyright License. You grant Microsoft, and those who receive the Submission directly or
    indirectly from Microsoft, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license in the
    Submission to reproduce, prepare derivative works of, publicly display, publicly perform, and distribute
    the Submission and such derivative works, and to sublicense any or all of the foregoing rights to third
    parties.
  • Patent License. You grant Microsoft, and those who receive the Submission directly or
    indirectly from Microsoft, a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free, irrevocable license under
    Your patent claims that are necessarily infringed by the Submission or the combination of the
    Submission with the Project to which it was Submitted to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell and
    import or otherwise dispose of the Submission alone or with the Project.
  • Other Rights Reserved. Each party reserves all rights not expressly granted in this Agreement.
    No additional licenses or rights whatsoever (including, without limitation, any implied licenses) are
    granted by implication, exhaustion, estoppel or otherwise.
  1. Representations and Warranties. You represent that You are legally entitled to grant the above
    licenses. You represent that each of Your Submissions is entirely Your original work (except as You may
    have disclosed under Section 3). You represent that You have secured permission from Your employer to
    make the Submission in cases where Your Submission is made in the course of Your work for Your
    employer or Your employer has intellectual property rights in Your Submission by contract or applicable
    law. If You are signing this Agreement on behalf of Your employer, You represent and warrant that You
    have the necessary authority to bind the listed employer to the obligations contained in this Agreement.
    You are not expected to provide support for Your Submission, unless You choose to do so. UNLESS
    REQUIRED BY APPLICABLE LAW OR AGREED TO IN WRITING, AND EXCEPT FOR THE WARRANTIES
    EXPRESSLY STATED IN SECTIONS 3, 4, AND 6, THE SUBMISSION PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS
    PROVIDED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTY OF
    NONINFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
  2. Notice to Microsoft. You agree to notify Microsoft in writing of any facts or circumstances of which
    You later become aware that would make Your representations in this Agreement inaccurate in any
    respect.
  3. Information about Submissions. You agree that contributions to Projects and information about
    contributions may be maintained indefinitely and disclosed publicly, including Your name and other
    information that You submit with Your Submission.
  4. Governing Law/Jurisdiction. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Washington, and
    the parties consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the federal courts sitting in King County,
    Washington, unless no federal subject matter jurisdiction exists, in which case the parties consent to
    exclusive jurisdiction and venue in the Superior Court of King County, Washington. The parties waive all
    defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction and forum non-conveniens.
  5. Entire Agreement/Assignment. This Agreement is the entire agreement between the parties, and
    supersedes any and all prior agreements, understandings or communications, written or oral, between
    the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement may be assigned by Microsoft.

@microsoft-github-policy-service agree

@Rahuldrabit
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Rahuldrabit commented Apr 5, 2026

Hi @Rahuldrabit , thanks for this PR! It looks great (I commented on the copilot review without realizing you have already addressed them.

  1. Can you please agree to the Contributor License Agreement - fix: handle None return from get_container_runtime() #159 (comment)?
  2. Do you know why the aiopslab-applications files are part of the PR?

Thank you @gaganso for your review . I have agreed to Contributor License Agreement already . I don't know why the aiopslab-applications files are part of the PR ? , can you please tell me why ? and which are the aiopslab application files

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants