Reformat CHANGELOG.md in a stricter keep-a-changelog format #5658
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
compulim
requested review from
a-b-r-o-w-n,
beyackle2,
cwhitten,
srinaath and
tdurnford
as code owners
OEvgeny
approved these changes
Dec 19, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changelog Entry
Description
Reformatting our CHANGELOG.md to enable packages like
keep-a-changelog.Design
We want to enable tooling like
keep-a-changelogfor more automations.Specific Changes
CHANGEGLOG.mdchmod +x bump-peer.shI have added tests and executed them locallyCHANGELOG.mdI have updated documentationReview Checklist
Accessibility reviewed (tab order, content readability, alt text, color contrast)Browser and platform compatibilities reviewedCSS styles reviewed (minimal rules, noz-index)Internationalization reviewed (strings, unit formatting)package.jsonandpackage-lock.jsonreviewedSecurity reviewed (no data URIs, check for nonce leak)Tests reviewed (coverage, legitimacy)