Skip to content

Conversation

@gene1wood
Copy link
Collaborator

  • Take a look at this branch
  • Figure out what it does
  • Decide if we want to use this
  • Merge it or make an issue capturing the idea or close and delete the branch

@gene1wood gene1wood changed the title Examine jp/unit tests Examine "jp/unit tests" branch Apr 13, 2018
@gene1wood gene1wood mentioned this pull request Apr 13, 2018
@gene1wood gene1wood assigned gene1wood and nnja and unassigned gene1wood Apr 14, 2018
@gene1wood
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@nnja Would you like to see if there's any unit test content here worth keeping?

@nnja
Copy link
Collaborator

nnja commented Apr 16, 2018

@gene1wood Sure. I'll take a look today or tomorrow.

@jpaugh
Copy link
Contributor

jpaugh commented May 8, 2018

So, I didn't have a very good story for testing agithub. If it were me, I'd rethink this, and restart from scratch. These tests don't mock up the GitHub API (which they probably should). They require connecting to the real API, and thus require entering real credentials for any non-public API usage.

@gene1wood
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@nnja based on @jpaugh's comment it sounds like we should remove unit tests and pursue some of the ideas you and I'd chatted about for starting from scratch on them with a good API mocking solution.

Maybe after the move from httplib to requests.

@nnja
Copy link
Collaborator

nnja commented May 14, 2018

@gene1wood @jpaugh Any chance either of you are at the PyCon 2018 sprints? I was thinking about working on this on Wednesday or for a half day on Thursday.

@gene1wood
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@nnja I'm not unfortunately. If you want to call out a day and time to meet online I could video chat.

@nnja
Copy link
Collaborator

nnja commented May 16, 2018

@gene1wood Any chance you're available between 10am and 12pm EST tomorrow?

@gene1wood
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@nnja Yes, ping me on keybase and we can coordinate a call.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants