Skip to content

Conversation

@larseggert
Copy link
Collaborator

Since we're considering their paid plan.

CC @sylvestre

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.84%. Comparing base (4f38c91) to head (40b5ad1).
⚠️ Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3194      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.73%   93.84%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         125      124       -1     
  Lines       37134    37239     +105     
  Branches    37134    37239     +105     
==========================================
+ Hits        34807    34948     +141     
+ Misses       1470     1425      -45     
- Partials      857      866       +9     
Components Coverage Δ
neqo-common 98.48% <ø> (+0.35%) ⬆️
neqo-crypto 84.39% <ø> (+0.71%) ⬆️
neqo-http3 93.86% <ø> (+0.19%) ⬆️
neqo-qpack 94.47% <ø> (ø)
neqo-transport 94.64% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
neqo-udp 82.42% <ø> (-0.42%) ⬇️
mtu 88.94% <ø> (ø)

@larseggert larseggert force-pushed the chore-ci-codspeed-runners branch from 151befd to 1c0d920 Compare December 9, 2025 09:00
Co-authored-by: Adrien Cacciaguerra <adrien.caccia@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Dec 16, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #3194 will not alter performance

Comparing larseggert:chore-ci-codspeed-runners (40b5ad1) with main (e74f986)1

Summary

✅ 12 untouched
🆕 11 new
⏩ 11 skipped2

Benchmarks breakdown

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
🆕 WallTime client N/A 402.1 ms N/A
🆕 WallTime client N/A 545.2 ms N/A
🆕 WallTime client N/A 546.1 ms N/A
🆕 WallTime client N/A 52.9 ms N/A
🆕 WallTime walltime N/A 94.3 ms N/A
🆕 WallTime walltime N/A 89.7 ms N/A
🆕 WallTime walltime N/A 92.9 ms N/A
🆕 WallTime walltime N/A 93.5 ms N/A
🆕 WallTime walltime N/A 147.2 ms N/A
🆕 WallTime walltime N/A 27.5 ms N/A
🆕 WallTime walltime N/A 1.3 ms N/A

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (819f23b) during the generation of this report, so e74f986 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

  2. 11 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@larseggert larseggert marked this pull request as ready for review December 16, 2025 20:29
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings December 16, 2025 20:29
@larseggert larseggert requested a review from mxinden as a code owner December 16, 2025 20:29
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR restructures the benchmarking infrastructure to support Codspeed's paid plan by splitting existing benchmarks into separate wallclock and simulated-time variants, and configuring the CI to run wallclock benchmarks on Codspeed runners while instrumentation benchmarks run on GitHub runners.

Key changes:

  • Split transfer.rs and streams.rs benchmarks into _wallclock and _simulated variants with shared common modules
  • Updated Cargo.toml files to specify appropriate Codspeed modes for each benchmark type
  • Modified CI workflows to default to Codspeed runners and route wallclock benchmarks to Codspeed infrastructure

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 16 out of 16 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

Show a summary per file
File Description
neqo-transport/benches/transfer_wallclock.rs New wallclock benchmark using black_box for compute efficiency measurement
neqo-transport/benches/transfer_simulated.rs New simulated-time benchmark measuring network protocol efficiency with throughput metrics
neqo-transport/benches/transfer_common.rs Extracted common setup and configuration logic for transfer benchmarks
neqo-transport/benches/transfer.rs Removed - split into separate wallclock/simulated benchmarks
neqo-transport/Cargo.toml Added benchmark metadata for Codspeed modes and disabled auto-benchmarks
neqo-http3/benches/streams_wallclock.rs New wallclock benchmark for HTTP/3 streams
neqo-http3/benches/streams_simulated.rs New simulated-time benchmark for HTTP/3 streams with throughput measurement
neqo-http3/benches/streams.rs Removed - split into separate wallclock/simulated benchmarks
neqo-http3/benches/common.rs Extracted common setup logic for HTTP/3 benchmarks
neqo-http3/Cargo.toml Updated benchmark metadata to specify Codspeed modes for split benchmarks
neqo-common/Cargo.toml Added criterion to cargo-machete ignore list and disabled auto-benchmarks
neqo-bin/Cargo.toml Added criterion to cargo-machete ignore list and disabled auto-benchmarks
.github/workflows/perfcompare.yml Changed default bencher to Codspeed and added logic for Codspeed runner selection
.github/workflows/codspeed.yml Refactored matrix generation to support per-benchmark runner assignment based on mode
.github/workflows/bench.yml Changed default bencher to Codspeed with appropriate runner selection
.github/actions/nss/action.yml Removed runner.environment == 'github-hosted' checks to support self-hosted runners

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Failed Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server, differences relative to main at b3338f9.

neqo-pr as clientneqo-pr as server
neqo-pr vs. aioquic: A
neqo-pr vs. go-x-net: A BP BA
neqo-pr vs. haproxy: A 🚀L1 C1 BP BA
neqo-pr vs. kwik: BP BA
neqo-pr vs. linuxquic: A
neqo-pr vs. lsquic: L1 C1
neqo-pr vs. msquic: A L1 C1
neqo-pr vs. mvfst: A L1 🚀C1
neqo-pr vs. nginx: A L1 C1 BP BA
neqo-pr vs. ngtcp2: A ⚠️L1 CM
neqo-pr vs. picoquic: A
neqo-pr vs. quic-go: A L1
neqo-pr vs. quiche: A 🚀C1 ⚠️L1 BP BA
neqo-pr vs. quinn: A ⚠️C1
neqo-pr vs. s2n-quic: A 🚀C1 ⚠️BP BA CM
neqo-pr vs. tquic: S A BP BA
neqo-pr vs. xquic: run cancelled after 20 min
aioquic vs. neqo-pr: CM
go-x-net vs. neqo-pr: CM
kwik vs. neqo-pr: BP BA CM
msquic vs. neqo-pr: CM
mvfst vs. neqo-pr: Z A L1 C1 CM
openssl vs. neqo-pr: LR M A CM
quic-go vs. neqo-pr: CM
quiche vs. neqo-pr: CM
quinn vs. neqo-pr: L1 V2 CM
s2n-quic vs. neqo-pr: ⚠️BP BA CM
tquic vs. neqo-pr: CM
xquic vs. neqo-pr: M CM
All results

Succeeded Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server

neqo-pr as client

neqo-pr as server

Unsupported Interop Tests

QUIC Interop Runner, client vs. server

neqo-pr as client

neqo-pr as server

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants