fix(deps): bulk upgrade deps and dev deps

[serhalp]

No description provided.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 4fc832c1-a287-44e7-b199-64506a61c254

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 69d233d and 7c29494.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• package-lock.json is excluded by !**/package-lock.json

📒 Files selected for processing (6)

• package.json
• packages/nuxt-module/package.json
• packages/vite-plugin-tanstack-start/package.json
• packages/vite-plugin/package.json
• packages/vite-plugin/src/main.test.ts
• packages/vite-plugin/tsconfig.json

🔗 Linked repositories identified

CodeRabbit considers these linked repositories for cross-repo context during reviews:

• netlify/blueprints (manual)

---

📝 Walkthrough

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated development and production dependencies across the project to latest stable versions, including build tools, testing frameworks, and TypeScript.
  • Updated module resolution configuration for improved compatibility.
  • Updated test syntax to align with current framework standards.

Walkthrough

Multiple devDependencies are bumped in the monorepo root package.json (eslint, prettier, husky, execa, typescript-eslint, and related plugins). Each package's package.json receives similar updates: packages/nuxt-module upgrades @nuxt/* packages, typescript to ~6.0.3, and vitest to ^4.1.9; packages/vite-plugin-tanstack-start updates playwright, semver, tsup, vite, and vitest; packages/vite-plugin bumps Node types, playwright, tsup, vite, vitest, and dedent. Alongside these, packages/vite-plugin/tsconfig.json changes module and moduleResolution to NodeNext, and a test assertion in packages/vite-plugin/src/main.test.ts is updated from rejects.toThrowError(...) to rejects.toThrow(...).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Description check	❓ Inconclusive	No pull request description was provided by the author, making it impossible to assess whether the description relates to the changeset.	Add a pull request description explaining the scope and rationale for the bulk dependency upgrades, such as bug fixes, security patches, or feature improvements included in the updated versions.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'fix(deps): bulk upgrade deps and dev deps' accurately summarizes the main changeset, which consists entirely of dependency version updates across multiple package.json files.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch serhalp/bulk-update-deps

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[serhalp]

Doesn't strictly matter, but we usually pin references to packages in the workspace

[serhalp]

Conversely, this is no longer a workspace package, so I unpinned it

[serhalp]

Turns out moduleResolution: "node" means the legacy node12 resolution mode 😬

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 7c29494214

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 7c29494214

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".