Conversation
gioboa
force-pushed
the
feat/add-qwik
branch
7 times, most recently
from
dfa0fcf to
d823c90
Compare
gioboa
force-pushed
the
feat/add-qwik
branch
2 times, most recently
from
206aa11 to
eddd119
Compare
| "build.preview": "vite build --ssr src/entry.preview.tsx", | ||
| "build.types": "tsc --incremental --noEmit", | ||
| "dev": "vite --open --mode ssr", | ||
| "preview": "qwik build preview && cp -r ./dist/* ./.output/public/ && vite preview --open", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This cp step is needed b/c some files are missing in the .output folder. 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should remove this extra step to have the possibility to use nitro presets 👀
|
|
Thanks for the PR! I have done a quick local test. Qwik vite plugin works perfectly well on it's own but adding server entry or server routes breaks both dev and prod. The requirement is, we need the Quik plugin to configure Please LMK if wanted to chat about this. |
untested because nitro fails to fallback to our server Co-authored-by: Giorgio Boa <gioboa@users.noreply.github.com>
wmertens
force-pushed
the
feat/add-qwik
branch
from
f886df1 to
44cb8b1
Compare
|
Moving to nitrojs/nitro#3825 as we have moved all other first class examples to core repo. This will also allow CI tests to run on each commit making sure integration works before release. |
3 participants
I added the nitro plugin on top of a minimal Qwik SSR configuration.