feat: Upgrading storages with new dict Django52 #977
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
awais786
approved these changes
Sep 24, 2025
feanil
requested changes
Sep 29, 2025
hunzlahmalik
force-pushed
the
master
branch
from
813bbb8 to
ead4858
Compare
feanil
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2025
Contributor
|
Looks like the failure we're seeing here is also happening on master. |
Contributor
|
I've created #980 to fix the upstream issue. Once that merges, I supect this will pass and we can merge this as well. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Deprecate STATICFILES_STORAGE and DEFAULT_FILE_STORAGE, and use STORAGE to upgrade to Django 5.2