OCPBUGS-88712: skip auto-sizing MachineConfig for master pool

[aksjadha]

- What I did

Removed the redundant 50-master-auto-sizing-disabled MachineConfig generation from the kubelet-config controller.

With PR #5491, autosizing is enabled by default only for worker nodes starting in 4.21. To preserve existing autosizing configuration during upgrades from earlier versions to 4.21, the 50-worker-auto-sizing-disabled and 50-master-auto-sizing-disabled MachineConfigs were generated in 4.20. However, since autosizing is only enabled by default for worker nodes, generating 50-master-auto-sizing-disabled is unnecessary.

- How to verify it

1. Deploy a cluster with this change on release-4.20
2. Verify that only 50-worker-auto-sizing-disabled MachineConfig is created
3. Verify that 50-master-auto-sizing-disabled MachineConfig is NOT created

- Description for the changelog

Skip generating the redundant 50-master-auto-sizing-disabled MachineConfig since autosizing is only enabled by default for worker nodes.

[openshift-merge-bot]

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

[openshift-ci-robot]

@aksjadha: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88712, which is invalid:

• release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
• expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88712 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.21.0, 4.21.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository: openshift/coderabbit/.coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 59201620-80ac-422d-bd6f-ceb51b31ba59

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[openshift-ci]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: aksjadha
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign umohnani8 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[aksjadha]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@aksjadha: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88712, which is invalid:

• expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88712 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.21.0, 4.21.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[aksjadha]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@aksjadha: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88712, which is invalid:

• expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88712 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.21.0, 4.21.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[aksjadha]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@aksjadha: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-88712, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.20.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.z)
• bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
• release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
• dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-89268 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
• dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-89268 targets the "4.21.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.21.0, 4.21.z
• bug has dependents

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

@aksjadha: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op-ocl-part1	47a54c9	link	false	/test e2e-gcp-op-ocl-part1
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op-ocl-part2	47a54c9	link	false	/test e2e-gcp-op-ocl-part2

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[ngopalak-redhat]

/hold
We have been thinking of enabling auto node sizing for master pool also, so 50-master-auto-sizing-disabled MachineConfig would be required on the 4.20 release
cc: @haircommander