Skip to content

Conversation

@josephdrichard
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dougbtv and jzding December 5, 2025 06:34
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: josephdrichard

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 5, 2025
@josephdrichard
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@josephdrichard
Copy link
Contributor Author

josephdrichard commented Dec 5, 2025

Security job failing because:

Open Issues

✗ [HIGH] Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information
Path: vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/internal/suite.go, line 360
Info: Information exposure through error stack trace in fmt.Printf.

✗ [HIGH] Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information
Path: vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/internal/suite.go, line 380
Info: Information exposure through error stack trace in fmt.Println.

✗ [HIGH] Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information
Path: vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/internal/suite.go, line 923
Info: Information exposure through error stack trace in fmt.Println.

✗ [HIGH] Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information
Path: vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/internal/suite.go, line 969
Info: Information exposure through error stack trace in fmt.Println.

✗ [HIGH] Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information
Path: vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/internal/suite.go, line 979
Info: Information exposure through error stack trace in fmt.Println.

✗ [HIGH] Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information
Path: vendor/github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2/internal/suite.go, line 992
Info: Information exposure through error stack trace in fmt.Println.

✗ [HIGH] Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information
Path: vendor/sigs.k8s.io/controller-runtime/pkg/log/log.go, line 64
Info: Information exposure through error stack trace in fmt.Fprintf.

@josephdrichard josephdrichard changed the title Ntpfailover backport 418 OCPBUGS-66972: Ntpfailover backport 418 Dec 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Dec 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@josephdrichard: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66972, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.18.z" version, but no target version was set
  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66972 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.19.0, 4.19.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 8, 2025
@josephdrichard
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@josephdrichard: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66972, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66970 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is New instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@josephdrichard
Copy link
Contributor Author

/verified later @klaskosk

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added verified-later verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria labels Dec 12, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@josephdrichard: This PR has been marked to be verified later by @klaskosk.

Details

In response to this:

/verified later @klaskosk

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@josephdrichard
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 12, 2025
@josephdrichard
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel
/jira refresh
/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 6, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@josephdrichard: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66972, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66970 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is New instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/hold cancel
/jira refresh
/retest

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 6, 2026

@josephdrichard: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/security b04f1e9 link false /test security

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria verified-later

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants