README Maintainer Attribution Update

[p25marti]

Summary

Added standardized maintainer attribution to the repository's README.md file to improve ownership clarity and accountability. An HTML comment identifying Paul Martins as the maintainer was inserted at the top of the README.md file. The change preserves all existing content and markdown structure, ensuring the documentation continues to render correctly on repository hosting platforms.

All requirements from the specification have been met: the HTML comment format was used, it was placed at the top of the file, existing formatting and structure were maintained, and the change does not break markdown rendering.

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

• Chores
  • Updated README metadata.

---

Note: This release contains no user-facing changes or new functionality.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b45872c and 8ea71c8.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

An HTML comment identifying the maintainer was added to the top of README.md. This is a documentation metadata addition with no impact on functionality or code behavior.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Metadata README.md	Added HTML comment with maintainer attribution.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Poem

🐰 A comment small, a name so grand,
Paul's mark now rests throughout the land,
In README's heart, the truth is told,
A maintainer's pride, worth more than gold! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'README Maintainer Attribution Update' directly and clearly describes the main change: adding maintainer attribution metadata to the README file.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch opslevel-readme_maintainer_attribution_update-aedf879a

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}