-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Handle multiple files from a single source when using curl to transfer #59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
EddieLF
wants to merge
1
commit into
main
Choose a base branch
from
transfer_script_multiple_curls
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO, I'd probably tweak this so the transfer_cmd returns a list of commands (or a single string), and then run multiple if it's a list. So we keep how it's run closer to the implementation.
Are there type annotations that are wrong here, or is files not used here, I'm a bit confused what the behaviour is supposed to be here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think files is not used here. There are two types of
Sourceobjects inreferences.py- sources containing a single reference file, for which onlysrcanddstare defined. Then there are sources containing multiple reference files. For these sources, the attributefilesis defined as a dict.When the
transfer_cmdisgsutil rsync, we copy the entiresrcdirectory to thedstdestination, meaning we get what's in thefilesdict with the correct directory structure (alongside whatever else the rsync picks up from the source), so there's no need to actually look at thefilesdict.Whereas for a curl, we need to actually look at all the files in the dict and execute curl command for each of them.
Can you elaborate? Are you suggesting something like updating this line to
And then updating the transfer script code to do something like
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh I see, I think this behaviour should be decided by the transfer_cmd implementation. It probably makes more sense to pass the
Source, and change thetransfer_cmdto take theSourceobject.RE the list of commands, I mean something like: