-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33.9k
gh-143635: Fix crash in _Py_typing_type_repr
#143670
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
sobolevn
wants to merge
2
commits into
python:main
Choose a base branch
from
sobolevn:issue-143635
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+42
−1
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions
1
Misc/NEWS.d/next/Core_and_Builtins/2026-01-11-20-11-36.gh-issue-143670.klnGoD.rst
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
| Fixes a crash in ``_Py_typing_type_repr`` function. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This sort of feels like the wrong place, shouldn't callers of the function ensure they have a reference to
pthat remains valid?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think so and we should just say that the function takes a strong reference (the function is not documented but it would be good to indicate this).
That means changing some
PyList_GET_ITEM/PyTuple_GET_ITEMand adding somePy_INCREFfor non-sequences.Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, I am not quite sure about it. Technically, we don't need a strong reference in regular cases, it is only needed for strange self-destructing ones.
We have multiple places where we just use
Py_INCREF/Py_DECREFon a object before calling some python callbacks with it. Changing this function to require a strong refenrence will require quite a lot of refactoring for a very niche thing (and might be a breaking change for anyone using this function, even though it is not documented).Let's say we want to refactor this place:
cpython/Objects/genericaliasobject.c
Lines 103 to 105 in e22b685
It would be:
This does not seem like a good API to me :/
What are the potential limitations of the current approach?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not exported as part of the public API so I'm not sure it's available by "others" (it's only an extern symbol in the internal API). Since it's internal we can also keep your change as it reduces the diff (I didn't think there would be that many places though)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe it is worth to open a separate PR for adding a strong ref?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No I think it should be decided here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No I think it should be decided here.