2025 10 08 int bump

[thedavidmeister]

Motivation

Solution

Checks

By submitting this for review, I'm confirming I've done the following:

• made this PR as small as possible
• unit-tested any new functionality
• linked any relevant issues or PRs
• included screenshots (if this involves a front-end change)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated license metadata to include an additional lockfile in the annotated paths.
  • Synchronized the interpreter interface reference to a newer upstream revision.
  • No functional, API, or behavioral changes; existing features continue to work as before.
  • No user-facing impact expected.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Adds an entry for "foundry.lock" in REUSE.toml’s annotated paths and updates the subproject pointer for lib/rain.interpreter.interface to commit 456c2365. No functional, API, or control-flow changes are introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary of Changes
Compliance config REUSE.toml	Adds "foundry.lock" to the annotated path list; no other configuration logic changed.
Subproject pointer update lib/rain.interpreter.interface	Updates subproject commit from f941041a… to 456c2365…; no API or control-flow changes noted.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• update int #41 — Updates the same lib/rain.interpreter.interface pointer (to an earlier commit), closely related to this pointer advance.
• bump interface #36 — Bumps the same subproject pointer; similar change pattern.
• 2025 06 01 update #34 — Also updates the lib/rain.interpreter.interface commit reference.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	❓ Inconclusive	The pull request title “2025 10 08 int bump” is ambiguous and does not clearly convey the main changes, which include adding “foundry.lock” to REUSE.toml and updating the interpreter interface subproject pointer; the use of a date and an unexplained abbreviation makes it hard for reviewers to quickly understand the purpose of this PR.	Please rename the title to clearly reflect the core updates, for example “Bump rain.interpreter.interface submodule to 456c236 and add foundry.lock to REUSE.toml,” so that the main changes are immediately obvious.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch 2025-10-08-int-bump

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 698588a and a927a9c.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)

• flake.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
• foundry.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• REUSE.toml (1 hunks)
• lib/rain.interpreter.interface (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)

• GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-legal)
• GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-static)
• GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-test)

🔇 Additional comments (2)

lib/rain.interpreter.interface (1)

1-1: Confirm upstream submodule commit availability.

Please double-check that commit 456c236536018c8067308287fbc3f9544a291120 exists in the remote rain.interpreter.interface repository and contains the intended changes, since we can’t inspect its diff here.

REUSE.toml (1)

14-15: Addition looks good

Including foundry.lock under the annotated paths keeps the REUSE metadata complete. No further action needed.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

@coderabbitai assess this PR size classification for the totality of the PR with the following criterias and report it in your comment:

S/M/L PR Classification Guidelines:

This guide helps classify merged pull requests by effort and complexity rather than just line count. The goal is to assess the difficulty and scope of changes after they have been completed.

Small (S)

Characteristics:

• Simple bug fixes, typos, or minor refactoring
• Single-purpose changes affecting 1-2 files
• Documentation updates
• Configuration tweaks
• Changes that require minimal context to review

Review Effort: Would have taken 5-10 minutes

Examples:

• Fix typo in variable name
• Update README with new instructions
• Adjust configuration values
• Simple one-line bug fixes
• Import statement cleanup

Medium (M)

Characteristics:

• Feature additions or enhancements
• Refactoring that touches multiple files but maintains existing behavior
• Breaking changes with backward compatibility
• Changes requiring some domain knowledge to review

Review Effort: Would have taken 15-30 minutes

Examples:

• Add new feature or component
• Refactor common utility functions
• Update dependencies with minor breaking changes
• Add new component with tests
• Performance optimizations
• More complex bug fixes

Large (L)

Characteristics:

• Major feature implementations
• Breaking changes or API redesigns
• Complex refactoring across multiple modules
• New architectural patterns or significant design changes
• Changes requiring deep context and multiple review rounds

Review Effort: Would have taken 45+ minutes

Examples:

• Complete new feature with frontend/backend changes
• Protocol upgrades or breaking changes
• Major architectural refactoring
• Framework or technology upgrades

Additional Factors to Consider

When deciding between sizes, also consider:

• Test coverage impact: More comprehensive test changes lean toward larger classification
• Risk level: Changes to critical systems bump up a size category
• Team familiarity: Novel patterns or technologies increase complexity

Notes:

• the assessment must be for the totality of the PR, that means comparing the base branch to the last commit of the PR
• the assessment output must be exactly one of: S, M or L (single-line comment) in format of: SIZE={S/M/L}
• do not include any additional text, only the size classification
• your assessment comment must not include tips or additional sections
• do NOT tag me or anyone else on your comment

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash

# Check the full diff of the PR to understand scope
echo "=== PR Diff Summary ==="
git diff origin/main...HEAD --stat

echo -e "\n=== Full PR Diff ==="
git diff origin/main...HEAD

# Check what changed in the submodule
echo -e "\n=== Submodule Changes ==="
cd lib/rain.interpreter.interface 2>/dev/null && \
git log --oneline f941041ac9564b5509e1e487052136b239b4bfc5..456c236536018c8067308287fbc3f9544a291120 && \
echo -e "\n=== Submodule Diff Summary ===" && \
git diff --stat f941041ac9564b5509e1e487052136b239b4bfc5..456c236536018c8067308287fbc3f9544a291120 || \
echo "Could not analyze submodule changes"

Length of output: 362

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash

# Check recent commits on this branch
echo "=== Recent Commits ==="
git log --oneline -10

echo -e "\n=== Files Changed in Last Few Commits ==="
git diff --stat HEAD~5..HEAD 2>/dev/null || git diff --stat HEAD~3..HEAD 2>/dev/null || git log --stat -3

echo -e "\n=== Current REUSE.toml Content ==="
cat REUSE.toml

echo -e "\n=== Check Submodule Status ==="
git submodule status

echo -e "\n=== Last Commit Changes ==="
git show --stat HEAD

Length of output: 1436

---

SIZE=S