-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
fix: remove duplicate radio role and optimize aria attributes #318
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @aojunhao123, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request primarily focuses on enhancing the accessibility of the segmented control component by optimizing its ARIA attributes. It addresses a potential issue where 'role="radio"' was redundantly applied, and it now explicitly communicates the orientation of the control to assistive technologies. Additionally, the PR includes a minor update to a testing library dependency and a small configuration change in the TypeScript setup. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
|
Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.
|
|
Warning Review the following alerts detected in dependencies. According to your organization's Security Policy, it is recommended to resolve "Warn" alerts. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 2.7.x #318 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.37% 99.38%
=======================================
Files 2 2
Lines 161 162 +1
Branches 40 41 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 160 161 +1
Misses 1 1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces excellent accessibility improvements. It correctly removes redundant role="radio" and aria-checked attributes from the label div, as these are already handled by the native radio input element. The addition of the aria-orientation attribute to the radiogroup is also a great enhancement for screen reader users. The dependency updates and related configuration changes in package.json and tsconfig.json are appropriate, and the test snapshots have been correctly updated to reflect these changes. Overall, these are solid improvements.
cc @afc163