Switch to Oxlint/Oxfmt

[glass-ships]

• Switches to using oxlint for frontend linting
• Addresses a couple minor linting and type-checking issues
• Modify the frontend lint pre-commit hook to check for bun or npm rather than only using npm

Same motivation as #342, but oxlint is by the Vue team and actually supports Vue style files, which biome currently does not support.

Full compatibility with eslint and prettier rules (no new or missing linting errors / formatting changes were made in running the new tool(s).

Will follow up with an analogous bumps PR if this is received well

[bmaranville]

I'm a little surprised by this suggested change - it doesn't seem better to me. What is the benefit of using the special @ construction?

[bmaranville]

I looked up this suggestion online... I can see the logic. Since we're already loading a resolver and aliases, it might be a good idea to simplify the bumps imports too from bumps-webview-client/src/... to @bumps/...

[glass-ships]

not the worst idea. do you want me to test that out in this PR or do it separately?

[bmaranville]

Sure, if you want to do it here that's fine!

[glass-ships]

I also need to see if I can't figure out why the CI types test is failing when it passes for me locally - it accurately assesses that there's an implicit type mismatch in some places, but how we'd want to address that is up for discussion

[glass-ships]

nice, you got it haha.
before we merge this, actually, I did just find out that biome 2.3 released which does also now include full support for Vue. I'm interested in updating that branch and seeing how we feel about one tool vs. the other

[bmaranville]

I don't have much knowledge of either tool. It's nice that our dependency list gets so much smaller with this change (prettier was a bit of a bear to manage)

[bmaranville]

It seems like both oxc and biomejs are missing the ability to deeply analyze the template part of Vuejs components like the eslint plugin does - is that something we want to give up? (they analyze the JS/TS but not the template?)

[glass-ships]

yeah i've tested biome again and run into the same issue as before (i didn't realize that PR was already on biome 2.3)
it mostly works as expected, but then you get a lot of "this function is unused", when in reality it is used, just within the template. which results in a lot of false positives.

i like that biome is a little more stringent and flexible, it's making a lot of really solid code style suggestions, and catching things that oxlint didn't (maybe we need to extend the rules?)
but that's a pretty major feature to be lacking.

at least oxlint seems to be respecting the template section and not throwing false positives around.

[glass-ships]

oh, one thing we may want to bring over from the biome PR is that DataView global property being shadowed

[bmaranville]

Agreed... it is just bad form to shadow globals!