bugfix: updated emission factors for new gasftcrec efficiencies

[robertsalzwedel]

Purpose of this PR

In PR 2034, the efficiency of the gasftcrec process was decreased. This should have affected the emission factors according to the formula:

Capture Rate(tech) = Emifac(input) * 0.9 - Emifac(output) / 0.95 * Efficiency(tech)

which can be found in the bottem of generisdata_emi.

As this wasnt done back then, this fixes the inconsistency.

Type of change

Indicate the items relevant for your PR by replacing ◻️ with ☑️.
Do not delete any lines. This makes it easier to understand which areas are affected by your changes and which are not.

Parts concerned

• ◻️ GAMS Code
• ◻️ R-scripts
• ◻️ Documentation (GAMS incode documentation, comments, tutorials)
• ☑️ Input data / CES parameters
• ◻️ Tests, CI/CD (continuous integration/deployment)
• ◻️ Configuration (switches in main.gms, default.cfg, and scenario_config*.csv files)
• ◻️ Other (please give a description)

Impact

• ☑️ Bug fix
• ◻️ Refactoring
• ◻️ New feature
• ☑️ Change of parameter values or input data (including CES parameters)
• ☑️ Minor change (default scenarios show only small differences)
• ◻️ Fundamental change of results of default scenarios

Checklist

Do not delete any line. Leave unfinished elements unchecked so others know how far along you are.
In the end all checkboxes must be ticked before you can merge.

• I executed the automated model tests (make test) after my final commit and all tests pass (FAIL 0)
• I adjusted the reporting in remind2 if and where it was needed
• I adjusted the madrat packages (mrremind and other packages involved) for input data generation if and where it was needed
• My code follows the coding etiquette
• I explained my changes within the PR, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I checked that the in-code documentation is up-to-date
• I adjusted forbiddenColumnNames in readCheckScenarioConfig.R in case the PR leads to deprecated switches
• I updated the CHANGELOG.md correctly (added, changed, fixed, removed, input data/calibration)

Further information (optional)

• Runs with these changes are here:
• Comparison of results (what changes by this PR?):

[fschreyer]

Nice! Is this pm_emifac(gasftcrec) > pm_emifac(gasftrec) issue solved / weakened with this?

[robertsalzwedel]

Nice! Is this pm_emifac(gasftcrec) > pm_emifac(gasftrec) issue solved / weakened with this?

I will doublecheck, it might :)