Skip to content

Conversation

@rostilos
Copy link
Owner

…pipeline

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2026

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

  • 🔍 Trigger a full review
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/PR-qdrant-indexes

Tip

🧪 Unit Test Generation v2 is now available!

We have significantly improved our unit test generation capabilities.

To enable: Add this to your .coderabbit.yaml configuration:

reviews:
  finishing_touches:
    unit_tests:
      enabled: true

Try it out by using the @coderabbitai generate unit tests command on your code files or under ✨ Finishing Touches on the walkthrough!

Have feedback? Share your thoughts on our Discord thread!


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@rostilos
Copy link
Owner Author

/codecrow analyze

@rostilos
Copy link
Owner Author

/codecrow analyze

@codecrow-ai
Copy link

codecrow-ai bot commented Jan 29, 2026

⚠️ CodeCrow Command Failed

Comment commands are not enabled for this project


Check the job logs in CodeCrow for detailed error information.

@codecrow-local
Copy link

⚠️ Code Analysis Results

Summary

Pull Request Review: feat: Implement PR-specific indexing and hybrid query support in RAG …

Status PASS WITH WARNINGS
Risk Level MEDIUM
Review Coverage 3 files analyzed in depth
Confidence HIGH

Executive Summary

This PR introduces PR-specific indexing and hybrid query capabilities by updating the multi-stage orchestrator and the RAG API. The implementation successfully addresses previous limitations regarding content indexing and API error handling for specialized queries. However, a potential risk exists regarding the synchronization of metadata schemas between the orchestrator and the retrieval API, which could impact query precision.

Recommendation

Decision: PASS WITH WARNINGS

The PR is architecturally sound and resolves several core logic issues. The "Pass with Warnings" status is issued due to a cross-file concern regarding metadata schema alignment; verify that metadata keys used for indexing in the orchestrator match the filtering keys expected by the RAG API before deployment.


Issues Overview

Severity Count
ℹ️ Info 1 Informational notes and suggestions
✅ Resolved 3 Resolved issues

Analysis completed on 2026-01-29 22:24:52 | View Full Report | Pull Request


📋 Detailed Issues (1)

ℹ️ Informational Notes

Id on Platform: 1633

Category: ✨ Best Practices

File: .../service/multi_stage_orchestrator.py

Issue: The TODO for custom project rules remains unaddressed in this diff.

💡 Suggested Fix

Implement a mechanism to load and apply project-specific analysis rules.

No suggested fix provided

View Issue Details


Files Affected

  • .../service/multi_stage_orchestrator.py: 3 issues
  • .../api/api.py: 1 issue

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants