Skip to content

Conversation

@compojoom
Copy link
Collaborator

@compojoom compojoom commented Jan 12, 2026

Release PR

Merging development branch into main for production release.

Recent changes included:


Note

Improves simulation accuracy for guarded Safes and updates build tooling.

  • Introduces STORAGE_OVERRIDE in simulation.ts to set Safe threshold to 1 and zero out guard (via GUARD_STORAGE_POSITION) during Tenderly simulations; updates storage layout doc link
  • Applies the new override in the simulation payload via getStateOverride
  • Upgrades hardhat in apps/tx-builder/package.json and refreshes dependencies in yarn.lock

Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit b823488. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.

Implemented additional state override mechanism to disable cosigner
guard protection during simulation execution, preventing simulation
failures when guards are active.
…on-with-guard-enabled-accounts-tx-builder

feat: Transaction-Builder - Override state to pass simulation when Guard enabled [COR-28]
Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: b823488a16

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +43 to +44
// Guard: 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
[GUARD_STORAGE_POSITION]: `0x${'0'.padStart(64, '0')}`,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Preserve guard behavior in simulations

The new state override forces the Safe’s guard slot to 0x0 for every simulation, which disables all guard checks. For any Safe that relies on a guard (e.g., spending limits or allowlists), Tenderly will now simulate a transaction as successful even though the real execution would revert in the guard, so users can get a false “success” result. This regression applies whenever a guard is set, not just the cosigner guard.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@github-actions
Copy link

Copy link
Collaborator

@gjeanmart gjeanmart left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@compojoom compojoom merged commit 8e9884e into main Jan 12, 2026
12 of 28 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 12, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants