Skip to content

Conversation

@harveydevereux
Copy link
Collaborator

@harveydevereux harveydevereux commented Feb 5, 2026

  • fine tuning
  • test fine tuning
  • test training
  • docs

Grace is quite slow it seems (60s for 1 epoch fine-tuning) and memory hungry (13Gb)

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file would not be required if we upgraded to tensorpotential 0.5.5 since that add extxyz support.

It is small though, and it requires various modifications to the xyz's we have as well

Copy link
Member

@ElliottKasoar ElliottKasoar Feb 5, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We definitely should upgrade at some point, but it introduces conflicts with basically everything else via PyTorch/CUDA conflicts (see ICAMS/grace-tensorpotential#23), if I remember correctly

This may be more tractable once we cut out some of the unsupported MLIPs from our extras

@ElliottKasoar ElliottKasoar added the enhancement New/improved feature or request label Feb 5, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New/improved feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants