Skip to content

Fix password_strength_checker_controller.js strength classes#227

Open
daphneslootmans wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
69-password-strength
Open

Fix password_strength_checker_controller.js strength classes#227
daphneslootmans wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
69-password-strength

Conversation

@daphneslootmans
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@daphneslootmans daphneslootmans commented Mar 27, 2026

Summary by Sourcery

Bug Fixes:

  • Correct password strength class mapping so the highest strength level uses 'very-strong' instead of reusing intermediate classes.

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Mar 27, 2026

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Adjusts the password strength meter’s CSS class mapping so that the third strength level is treated as medium and only higher levels are mapped to strong/very-strong.

Flow diagram for password strength value to CSS class mapping

flowchart LR
  A[Compute_password_strength 0_to_4] --> B{strength_value}

  B -->|0| C[Apply_CSS_class_weak]
  B -->|1| D[Apply_CSS_class_medium]
  B -->|2| E[Apply_CSS_class_medium]
  B -->|3| F[Apply_CSS_class_strong]
  B -->|4| G[Apply_CSS_class_very_strong]
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Correct password strength level-to-class mapping for the UI meter.
  • Update the strength-to-class array so the third strength bucket maps to the 'medium' class instead of 'strong'
  • Preserve the existing five-level structure of the meter while rebalancing which levels are considered strong vs very-strong
assets-public/controllers/password_strength_checker_controller.js

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey - I've left some high level feedback:

  • Consider validating or clamping the strength index (or documenting its expected range) so that changes to the strength scoring logic in the future don’t accidentally access outside the classes array.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- Consider validating or clamping the `strength` index (or documenting its expected range) so that changes to the strength scoring logic in the future don’t accidentally access outside the `classes` array.

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants