Skip to content

Added solutions#2494

Open
LeelaTotapally wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
LeelaTotapally:master
Open

Added solutions#2494
LeelaTotapally wants to merge 1 commit into
super30admin:masterfrom
LeelaTotapally:master

Conversation

@LeelaTotapally
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@super30admin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Search inside a Rotated Sorted Array (Problem1.java)

Strengths:

  • The solution is well-structured with clear comments
  • Uses binary search correctly on a flattened 2D matrix
  • Properly handles edge cases (returns false when not found)
  • Good variable naming and code organization

Areas for Improvement:

  1. Wrong Problem: The solution addresses a completely different problem (2D matrix search) rather than the rotated sorted array search problem that was assigned.
  2. Operator Precedence Bug: The line int mid = low + (high-low/2) has incorrect parentheses. Due to operator precedence, this evaluates as low + (high - (low/2)) instead of (low + high) / 2. Should be int mid = low + (high - low) / 2.
  3. Misleading Comments: The comments reference a 2D matrix problem, which is not relevant to the rotated sorted array problem.
  4. Time Complexity: For the problem it solves (2D matrix), the O(log(m*n)) complexity is correct, but for the intended problem, this approach wouldn't work at all.

Recommendation: Please ensure you read the problem statement carefully and implement the correct algorithm. For the rotated sorted array problem, you need to use a modified binary search that determines which half of the array is sorted and then decide which half to search based on where the target lies.

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT


Search Inside a Sorted Array whose Length is unknown (Problem2.java)

Strengths:

  • Clean, well-indented code with good variable naming
  • Clear comments explaining the approach
  • Correct implementation of binary search for rotated arrays
  • Proper use of low + (high - low)/2 to prevent integer overflow

Areas for Improvement:

  • The solution addresses a completely different problem (rotated sorted array search) rather than the unknown-length sorted array search
  • The code doesn't use the ArrayReader interface as required
  • For the unknown-length array problem, the solution should:
    1. First use exponential search (doubling high until reader.get(high) > target) to find bounds
    2. Then perform binary search within those bounds
  • The comment incorrectly states "We are using binary search to find the target in the rotated sorted array" - this is not the problem being asked

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT


Search a 2D Matrix

Strengths:

  1. Excellent documentation with time/space complexity comments
  2. Clear explanation of approach in comments
  3. Problem 2 shows solid understanding of binary search variations
  4. Clean code structure with proper variable naming

Areas for Improvement:

  1. Critical Bug in Problem 1: The mid calculation low + (high-low/2) has incorrect operator precedence. It should be low + (high - low) / 2. Always use parentheses to ensure correct order of operations.
  2. Problem 2: The comment at the end //5,6,7,0,1,2,3 appears to be leftover debug code or an incomplete comment - should be removed for cleaner code.
  3. Consider adding early return optimization (optional): In Problem 1, you could check if target is out of bounds of the matrix's range at the start to potentially save iterations.

VERDICT: NEEDS_IMPROVEMENT

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants