Skip to content

Add Xquik API documentation and alphabetize the API section - #70

Open
kriptoburak wants to merge 2 commits into
testthedocs:mainfrom
kriptoburak:add-xquik
Open

Add Xquik API documentation and alphabetize the API section#70
kriptoburak wants to merge 2 commits into
testthedocs:mainfrom
kriptoburak:add-xquik

Conversation

@kriptoburak

@kriptoburak kriptoburak commented Mar 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚀 Pull Request

📄 Description

  • Add Xquik API Documentation to the API section.
  • Describe the current REST, OpenAPI, MCP, webhook, and workflow documentation.
  • Alphabetize all 25 API entries, contributing to Most sections need to be alphabetized #28.

The independent ordering fix moves DevDocsAI and corrects the ReDoc ordering. It remains separate from the Xquik addition.

Validation

  • Confirmed the complete API section sorts alphabetically.
  • Confirmed all 4 affected links return HTTP 200.
  • Confirmed one Xquik entry and one DevDocsAI entry.
  • Confirmed the branch is based on current main.
  • Confirmed both commits are signed and GitHub-verified.
  • Ran git diff --check.

Xquik is an independent third-party service. Not affiliated with X Corp. "Twitter" and "X" are trademarks of X Corp.

@kriptoburak kriptoburak changed the title Add Xquik API Documentation Add Xquik API documentation and improve API ordering Jul 30, 2026
@kriptoburak kriptoburak changed the title Add Xquik API documentation and improve API ordering Add Xquik API documentation and alphabetize the API section Jul 30, 2026
@kriptoburak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

A final rules audit found one remaining API ordering inversion: ReDoc followed Redoc-Editor. I rebuilt the branch as 2 signed commits. The independent commit now leaves all 25 API entries alphabetized. All 4 affected links return HTTP 200, both entries remain unique, and git diff --check passes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant