Add new property "Partial" to the InfluxDB Serie response model.#85
Open
tbraun-hk wants to merge 1 commit intotihomir-kit:masterfrom
Open
Add new property "Partial" to the InfluxDB Serie response model.#85tbraun-hk wants to merge 1 commit intotihomir-kit:masterfrom
tbraun-hk wants to merge 1 commit intotihomir-kit:masterfrom
Conversation
Partial is a boolean field returned by InfluxDB if a response has been truncated due to chunking or to exceeding a configured max-row-limit configuration.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Partial is a boolean value returned by InfluxDB if a response has been truncated due to chunking or to exceeding a configured max-row-limit in the response.
Adding this property is sufficient to expose the functionality to users of InfluxData.NET. I've tested it successfully with InfluxDB 1.7.6-1
The change is very simple and does not require changing existing code, which is why I'd rather not add another test case for it.