-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New multithreaded API #43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
projekter
wants to merge
9
commits into
tpapp:master
Choose a base branch
from
projekter:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0056081
New multithreaded API
projekter c9f40c5
Fix leftover from old approach
projekter 76c0713
Expose both schedulers and define default scheduler functions
projekter 05cd12b
Remove unnecessary allocation
projekter cc14635
Split intransparent reduction function into two simpler ones: single-…
projekter f90b48a
Avoid unnecessary allocations
projekter edf9e4c
Add comment why we define EnumeratedCatVector
projekter e6e45b3
Use TaskLocalValue from OMT instead of OncePerTask
projekter b6c2e9a
Again unify single- and multi-threaded approach to avoid code duplica…
projekter File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this the source (and the fix) for the type instability? I am OK with this workaround but please leave a comment, eg
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, this has nothing to do with type instability. I did not introduce any kind of workaround, I just made sure that I don't introduce any new instabilities unrelated to the Sobol issue.
This is related to the way
OhMyThreadsdoes multithreading. Previously, the multithreaded iteration wasso that the iteration over the points is done in the main thread, which then spawns starting from the point that we already got. OMT instead might wants to index (with ranges) into the points, depending on the scheduler. So basically, we need something that
a) supports an
AbstractArrayinterface - whichIterators.takedoesn't do, but this could easily be mitigatedb) can be indexed randomly - but the
sis an iterator and the next points depends on the previous one. So I don't really see a good way around this pre-allocation of the points. It could be made a bit more efficiently by pre-allocating a matrix and then iterating into its columns instead of having a vector of vectors, but that's the best I can currently imagine.