Skip to content

zarzadzanie-pwr:1.0.0#5112

Open
junsevith wants to merge 4 commits into
typst:mainfrom
junsevith:main
Open

zarzadzanie-pwr:1.0.0#5112
junsevith wants to merge 4 commits into
typst:mainfrom
junsevith:main

Conversation

@junsevith

@junsevith junsevith commented Jun 19, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

I am submitting

  • a new package
  • an update for a package

Description: "Master's thesis template for management faculty of Wrocław University of Science and Technology based on official faculty guidelines"

I have read and followed the submission guidelines and, in particular, I

  • [] selected a name that isn't the most obvious or canonical name for what the package does
    • Explanation:
    • it means managing PWR in polish (pwr is name of the college)
  • added a typst.toml file with all required keys
  • added a README.md with documentation for my package
  • have chosen a license and added a LICENSE file or linked one in my README.md
  • tested my package locally on my system and it worked
  • excluded PDFs or README images, if any, but not the LICENSE
  • ensured that my package is licensed such that users can use and distribute the contents of its template directory without restriction, after modifying them through normal use.

@typst-package-check typst-package-check Bot added the new A new package submission. label Jun 19, 2026
@junsevith

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Checks do not pass because bot does not have typst 0.15.0 which is required by package

@saecki saecki self-assigned this Jun 24, 2026

@saecki saecki left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for this package!

Checks do not pass because bot does not have typst 0.15.0 which is required by package

That was an oversight on our side. We released version 0.6.0 of the package check which supports Typst 0.15.0, but the github action still pulled in the 0.5.0 version of the package check image. This should now be fixed and if you rebase onto main the new version should be run in the CI.
I've run the package check locally and the package builds as expected. But there are still a few warnings regarding the use of snake_case instead of kebab-case.

autor: "Imię i Nazwisko",
kierunek: [],
specjalnosc: [],
rodzaj_pracy: [],

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These parameters seem to be using snake_case instead of kebab-case. This is a bit inconsistent with the other ones below. Could you change them?

@saecki saecki added the waiting-on-author Pull request waits on author label Jun 25, 2026
@saecki

saecki commented Jul 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hello. Can you please update your package submission to take into account the comments above? In case you don't have time to do so for now, I will close this PR to keep our review backlog organized. You can of course open a new PR once you have fixed the mentioned issues.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

new A new package submission. waiting-on-author Pull request waits on author

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants