support embedded generic interfaces#13
Conversation
|
cc @sywhang |
|
Thanks @n0trace , I'll get to this shortly. |
|
Hey @n0trace and @sywhang - I have a similar PR in the origin repo: golang/mock#663 TIA for your consideration, and for taking over this great tool! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
One case I think we should cover is variadic type parameters.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
naming: Could the more sophisticated types be named by their function instead of a number? It took some time for me to organize which cases were tested while reviewing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
thanks, you are right, i redesigned the case, including the additions under this file
r-hang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes look good to me after these comment! Thanks for adding the Variadic case and clearing up the function of the examples.
sywhang
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM - thank you for this work!
migrate golang/mock#669
fixes golang/mock#668 golang/mock#658 golang/mock#700