Skip to content

Conversation

@chris-ashe
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Checklist

I confirm that I have completed the following checks:

  • My changes follow the PROCESS style guide
  • I have justified any large differences in the regression tests caused by this pull request in the comments.
  • I have added new tests where appropriate for the changes I have made.
  • If I have had to change any existing unit or integration tests, I have justified this change in the pull request comments.
  • If I have made documentation changes, I have checked they render correctly.
  • I have added documentation for my change, if appropriate.

…t` for clarity and update references in tests
…ectly instead of using an `icomponent` switch; update corresponding tests for consistency.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 30, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 41.22449% with 144 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 46.45%. Comparing base (89a0b72) to head (17b91cf).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
process/vacuum.py 26.92% 76 Missing ⚠️
process/blanket_library.py 43.39% 30 Missing ⚠️
process/shield.py 72.30% 18 Missing ⚠️
process/io/plot_proc.py 5.88% 16 Missing ⚠️
process/caller.py 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
process/main.py 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4075      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   46.46%   46.45%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         122      123       +1     
  Lines       28838    28923      +85     
==========================================
+ Hits        13401    13436      +35     
- Misses      15437    15487      +50     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@chris-ashe chris-ashe changed the title Standardise more blkt code ♻️ Standardise more blkt code Jan 30, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants