Skip to content

Enhancement/106 Migrate the review flow to Opus 5 / Sonnet 5 #105

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
s100ian merged 4 commits into from
Jul 30, 2026
Merged

Enhancement/106 Migrate the review flow to Opus 5 / Sonnet 5 #105

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
268546c
Migrate Claude model IDs to the 5 generation
claude Jul 24, 2026
56b9247
Tune review flow for the Opus 5 / Sonnet 5 reviewers
claude Jul 24, 2026
df59032
Restore effort: high on the frontend reviewer
claude Jul 24, 2026
245f4d3
Update model from claude-sonnet-5 to claude-opus-5
s100ian Jul 30, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion .claude/agents/uniplan-web-fe-reviewer.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
---
name: uniplan-web-fe-reviewer
description: uniplan-web frontend reviewer. Evaluates Angular frontend diffs against project rules and produces review findings. Read-only — cannot edit code. System prompt carries the distilled reviewer context. Use for PR review flows and security passes on frontend code.
model: claude-sonnet-4-6
model: claude-opus-5
effort: high
tools: Read, Glob, Grep, Bash, Skill, ToolSearch
---
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ Tests:

If no issues found, state: **"No issues found."**

**Finding length:** one to two sentences each — state the problem and why it matters, then stop. Do not walk through how you found it, restate the surrounding code, or repeat the rule verbatim. Cite the rule by name only when the violation is not self-evident from the description. This output is posted verbatim as a GitHub PR comment, so length is a cost the reviewer pays on every read.

## Workflow specifics

- **PR review** — invoking prompt provides worktree path + base/head. Context line: `PR #<number> review`.
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ jobs:
# The prompt posts via `gh pr review`, diffs via `git`, dispatches the
# uniplan-web-fe-reviewer subagent (Task) and runs /review-pr (Skill).
claude_args: >-
--model claude-sonnet-4-6
--model claude-opus-5
--allowedTools "Bash(gh pr review:*),Bash(gh pr diff:*),Bash(gh pr view:*),Bash(git:*),Task,Read,Glob,Grep,Skill"
prompt: |
Run the project's `/review-pr` skill against PR #${{ inputs.pr_number }}
Expand Down