20251225 lost stolen devices en #1783
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
🚀 Deployed on https://deploy-preview-1783--utelecon.netlify.app |
phenylshima
approved these changes
Dec 28, 2025
Member
phenylshima
left a comment
phenylshima
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
作成ありがとうございます．
コメントをつけましたが，留めておく理由はないので，Approveです．
|
|
||
| - [The tools usage guideline for online class since S semester 2021](./guideline/) | ||
| - [How to Announce Online Class URL (for Faculty Members)](/en/faculty_members/url/) | ||
| - Reference: [How to Obtain the Online Class URL (for Students)](/en/oc/url/) |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Relatedとかの方が良かったりします？自信はないですが．
Comment on lines
10
to
19
| 1. University’s Position: The University of Tokyo does not enforce a blanket prohibition on the use of generative AI tools. Instead, we are actively exploring their potential and plan to provide practical guidance for their use. | ||
| 1. Use in Classes: The decision whether or not to allow the use of generative AI tools will depend on the class. This decision, along with the conditions for their use, is left to the discretion of individual instructors. Please follow the guidelines set by your department, section, and each class instructor regarding the use of these tools. | ||
| 1. Educational Impact: University education places a premium on enhancing students’ thinking abilities through the process of acquiring and refining knowledge. Generative AI tools automate the collection and organization of information and display only the results. Relying solely on generative AI tools for class assignments could deprive students of essential opportunities to exercise their thought processes, potentially impeding long-term personal development. This is why certain classes may prohibit the use of these tools or set specific conditions for their use. | ||
| 1. Academic Misconduct: Respecting each person’s ideas and originality is paramount not only in academia but in all social activities. When producing reports and papers, it is essential to properly cite sources and express your unique thoughts. It is unacceptable to present text generated by AI tools as your own when submitting class assignments. | ||
| 1. Potential for Errors: Text generated by AI tools may contain errors or information that does not align with the user’s intentions, even if it seems plausible at first glance. AI responses can also contain biases based on their training data and algorithms. Rather than accepting AI-generated results at face value, it is crucial to scrutinize them and make adjustments as necessary. As with internet searching, assessing the credibility of AI-generated content and making corrections is a vital skill in today’s society. | ||
| 1. Legal Risks: It has been suggested that the output of AI tools, not just generative ones, may potentially pose problems related to copyright and design rights. Therefore, it is important to note that using generated results as is may entail legal risks in the future. In some cases, it may be necessary to indicate which tools were used. | ||
| 1. Information Security: Information entered into AI tools can potentially be used in some form for AI training. Never input confidential information, personal information, or unpublished research results, as the information might be leaked. | ||
| 1. Future Plans: AI tools are constantly evolving, and the precautions for their use may change accordingly. The above guidelines are based on the situation as of May 2023. We will continue to update them as necessary in the future. | ||
| 2. Use in Classes: The decision whether or not to allow the use of generative AI tools will depend on the class. This decision, along with the conditions for their use, is left to the discretion of individual instructors. Please follow the guidelines set by your department, section, and each class instructor regarding the use of these tools. | ||
| 3. Educational Impact: University education places a premium on enhancing students’ thinking abilities through the process of acquiring and refining knowledge. Generative AI tools automate the collection and organization of information and display only the results. Relying solely on generative AI tools for class assignments could deprive students of essential opportunities to exercise their thought processes, potentially impeding long-term personal development. This is why certain classes may prohibit the use of these tools or set specific conditions for their use. | ||
| 4. Academic Misconduct: Respecting each person’s ideas and originality is paramount not only in academia but in all social activities. When producing reports and papers, it is essential to properly cite sources and express your unique thoughts. It is unacceptable to present text generated by AI tools as your own when submitting class assignments. | ||
| 5. Potential for Errors: Text generated by AI tools may contain errors or information that does not align with the user’s intentions, even if it seems plausible at first glance. AI responses can also contain biases based on their training data and algorithms. Rather than accepting AI-generated results at face value, it is crucial to scrutinize them and make adjustments as necessary. As with internet searching, assessing the credibility of AI-generated content and making corrections is a vital skill in today’s society. | ||
| 6. Legal Risks: It has been suggested that the output of AI tools, not just generative ones, may potentially pose problems related to copyright and design rights. Therefore, it is important to note that using generated results as is may entail legal risks in the future. In some cases, it may be necessary to indicate which tools were used. | ||
| 7. Information Security: Information entered into AI tools can potentially be used in some form for AI training. Never input confidential information, personal information, or unpublished research results, as the information might be leaked. | ||
| 8. Future Plans: AI tools are constantly evolving, and the precautions for their use may change accordingly. The above guidelines are based on the situation as of May 2023. We will continue to update them as necessary in the future. |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
フォーマッタが走ってしまっていたようなので修正しました
Updated the guidelines for the use of generative AI tools in educational settings, ensuring clarity and consistency in the numbering of sections.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
https://deploy-preview-1783--utelecon.netlify.app/en/docs/
https://deploy-preview-1783--utelecon.netlify.app/en/docs/guide-for-lost-stolen-devices/