-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
Fix coverage files generation #7401
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
09a916d to
9020634
Compare
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
|
having at least linux passing would be an improvement! :) |
ab91264 to
4f801c9
Compare
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
66fd2fa to
5812e9c
Compare
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
cc00e9b to
51e845c
Compare
|
FINALLY it seems to work. However, there is still a problem with result upload on codecov |
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
4178c97 to
1545a9b
Compare
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
69f4925 to
8997ebf
Compare
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
f344644 to
47b2096
Compare
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
|
@sylvestre this is ready to review ^^ |
|
Not a trivial change. Kudos! |
|
GNU testsuite comparison: |
|
well done! |
Fixes #7282 issue about LLVM instrumentation.
The remain BIG issue is that the quantity of trace files generated by the WHOLE testsuite is absolutely massive, because 1 call to the tested binary produces 1 trace file that is around 5 MiB.
On my machine, the testsuite had to stop at ~80% completion because it had filled my disk with 92GiB of
.profrawfiles.