bump to df 52 #5717

Performance Regression: -46.77%

⚡ 37 improvements
❌ 75 regressions
✅ 1046 untouched
⏩ 617 skipped¹

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

	Benchmark	`BASE`	`HEAD`	Change
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 2)]`	123.6 µs	150.2 µs	-17.73%
❌	`compare_int`	79.3 ms	141.3 ms	-43.89%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 128)]`	126.4 µs	153.2 µs	-17.46%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 128)]`	452 µs	728.2 µs	-37.93%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 2)]`	450.1 µs	725.9 µs	-37.99%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 2048)]`	155.8 µs	187 µs	-16.65%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 32)]`	449.5 µs	727 µs	-38.17%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 8)]`	124.7 µs	150.6 µs	-17.17%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 512)]`	136.9 µs	163.5 µs	-16.27%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 2048)]`	524.6 µs	804.9 µs	-34.83%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 4)]`	123.9 µs	149.6 µs	-17.18%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(10000, 32)]`	124.2 µs	150.6 µs	-17.52%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 512)]`	505 µs	780.8 µs	-35.31%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 4)]`	449.8 µs	726.3 µs	-38.06%
❌	`bench_compare_primitive[(100000, 8)]`	450.6 µs	726.4 µs	-37.98%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(20000, 10000)]`	286.3 µs	361 µs	-20.69%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(10000, 10000)]`	213.6 µs	255.1 µs	-16.26%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(5000, 10000)]`	100.3 µs	111.5 µs	-10.06%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(7500, 10000)]`	112.9 µs	148.1 µs	-23.77%
❌	`bench_compare_sliced_dict_primitive[(9999, 10000)]`	118.2 µs	158.7 µs	-25.49%
...	...	...	...	...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

617 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩