fix(recall): ignore archived page titles#494
Conversation
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
Walkthrough
ChangesRecall digest filtering
Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Action performedReview finished.
|
02219b0 to
456742b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@src/vouch/recall.py`:
- Around line 84-87: Update the stats calculation in the page filtering flow
around all_pages, pages, and stats["hidden"] to use the count of non-archived
pages as the hidden-metric denominator rather than len(all_pages). Keep archived
pages excluded from both the visible results and the visibility-hidden count.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: 24b03f9e-0a06-4133-a164-22c0d467455f
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/vouch/recall.pytests/test_recall.py
456742b to
ba80581
Compare
Summary
Closes #490
Tests
Summary by CodeRabbit