fix(meetings): align P4W schedule anchor to land on Jun 15#131
Conversation
The 2026-05-16 change to a P4W (4-week) cadence kept the original anchor (2025-05-05), so the series landed on 2026-06-01 / 2026-06-29 and skipped the expected 2026-06-15 meeting. No agenda issue was created for it. Move the anchor to 2026-05-18 (4 weeks before 2026-06-15) so the 4-week series falls on 2026-06-15, 2026-07-13, ... while keeping the monthly cadence intact. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Note
Copilot was unable to run its full agentic suite in this review.
Updates the meeting agenda generation workflow schedule anchor date for the recurring meeting series.
Changes:
- Bumped the
schedulesstart date from 2025-05-05 to 2026-05-18 for theP4Wrecurrence.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| agendaLabel: 'tsc-agenda' | ||
| meetingLabels: 'meeting' | ||
| schedules: '2025-05-05T11:00:00.0[America/Chicago]/P4W' | ||
| schedules: '2026-05-18T11:00:00.0[America/Chicago]/P4W' |
|
@bjohansebas you can rebase and remove claude from the co-author as a bypass to the CLA for now. |
I don't think this is something you should recommend/we should do as that pretty much means, @bjohansebas would be faking their DCO (Developer Certificate of Origin) which violates Linux Foundation's CLA's |
|
@ovflowd aha! Thanks for the catch! I don't know why the co-author sign is not working. @alexander-akait wasnt this fixed for you earlier? |
|
I think it's only available for certain repositories. |
@bjohansebas Can we land this today, June 16th? Edit: oh you meant the meeting landed on a given day, not land the PR on a given day. Ignore this |
|
/easycla |
1 similar comment
|
/easycla |
|
@bjohansebas feel free to merge |
|
@alexander-akait I don't have write access to the repository |
The 2026-05-16 change to a P4W (4-week) cadence kept the original anchor (2025-05-05), so the series landed on 2026-06-01 / 2026-06-29 and skipped the expected 2026-06-15 meeting. No agenda issue was created for it.
Move the anchor to 2026-05-18 (4 weeks before 2026-06-15) so the 4-week series falls on 2026-06-15, 2026-07-13, ... while keeping the monthly cadence intact.
Summary
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Did you add tests for your changes?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
If relevant, what needs to be documented once your changes are merged or what have you already documented?
Use of AI