test: add conversations regression tests [WPB-19946]

[zhannach]

WPB-19946 [Web/QA] Write the Conversations regression tests in Playwright

Pull Request

Summary

Add conversations regression tests

---

Security Checklist (required)

• External inputs are validated & sanitized on client and/or server where applicable.
• API responses are validated; unexpected shapes are handled safely (fallbacks or errors).
• No unsafe HTML is rendered; if unavoidable, sanitization is applied and documented where it happens.
• Injection risks (XSS/SQL/command) are prevented via safe APIs and/or escaping.

Accessibility (required)

• I have read and this PR upholds our Accessibility Best Practices.

Standards Acknowledgement (required)

• I have read and this PR upholds our Coding Standards and Tech Radar Choices.

---

Screenshots or demo (if the user interface changed)

Notes for reviewers

• Trade-offs:
• Follow-ups (linked issues):
• Linked PRs (e.g. web-packages):

[github-actions]

🔗 Download Full Report Artifact

🧪 Playwright Test Summary

• ✅ Passed: 211
• ❌ Failed: 2
• ⏭ Skipped: 13
• 🔁 Flaky: 11
• 📊 Total: 237
• ⏱ Total Runtime: 454.8s (~ 7 min 35 sec)

specs/2FA-for-TeamsSpecs/2fa-for-teams.spec.ts (❌ 0 failed, ⚠️ 1 flaky)

• ⚠️ f2a for teams > 2FA Code (tags: TC-8749, regression)

specs/Authentication/authentication.spec.ts (❌ 1 failed, ⚠️ 1 flaky)

• ❌ Authentication > Make sure user does not see data of user of previous sessions on same browser (tags: TC-1311, regression)
• ⚠️ Authentication > Verify current browser is set as temporary device (tags: TC-3460, regression)

specs/Block/block.spec.ts (❌ 0 failed, ⚠️ 1 flaky)

• ⚠️ Block: User A and User B are NOT in the same team > Verify you can unblock someone from conversation list options (tags: TC-148, regression)

specs/Conversations/conversations.spec.ts (❌ 0 failed, ⚠️ 2 flaky)

• ⚠️ Conversations > I want to see a system message with all group members mentioned when I create a group (tags: TC-2965, regression)
• ⚠️ Conversations > I can see the system message "You renamed the conversation" after renaming conversation (tags: TC-496, regression)

specs/CriticalFlow/groupCalls-TC-8632.spec.ts (❌ 1 failed, ⚠️ 0 flaky)

• ❌ Planning group call with sending various messages during call (tags: TC-8632, crit-flow-web)

specs/CriticalFlow/messagesInChannels-TC-8753.spec.ts (❌ 0 failed, ⚠️ 1 flaky)

• ⚠️ Messages in Channels (tags: TC-8753, crit-flow-web)

specs/CriticalFlow/messagesInGroups-TC-8751.spec.ts (❌ 0 failed, ⚠️ 1 flaky)

• ⚠️ Messages in Groups (tags: TC-8751, crit-flow-web)

specs/Markdown/markdown.spec.ts (❌ 0 failed, ⚠️ 1 flaky)

• ⚠️ Markdown > I want to write a url with markdown (Mixed with text) (tags: TC-1319, regression)

specs/Notifications/notifications.spec.ts (❌ 0 failed, ⚠️ 1 flaky)

• ⚠️ Notifications > I want to receive notifications for mentions (tags: TC-3499, regression)

specs/SelfDeletingMessages/selfDeletingMessages.spec.ts (❌ 0 failed, ⚠️ 1 flaky)

• ⚠️ Self Deleting Messages > Verify the message is not deleted for users that didn't read the message (tags: TC-675, regression)

specs/Status/status.spec.ts (❌ 0 failed, ⚠️ 1 flaky)

• ⚠️ Status > When I am away, I should not get any notifications (tags: TC-3608, regression)

[thisisamir98]

Hi, this PR is too large to review, can you split it to multiple smaller PRs please?

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
7.0% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 5%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[zhannach]

Hi, this PR is too large to review, can you split it to multiple smaller PRs please?

I see your point. I opted for an atomic approach here because the tests are closely linked, and I wanted to avoid dependency issues between multiple PRs. I'll keep this in mind for future tasks.