-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 26
Add Clone bound to BitIter in Jet::decode()
#343
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
topologoanatom
wants to merge
1
commit into
BlockstreamResearch:master
Choose a base branch
from
topologoanatom:refactor/bit-iter-clone
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+7
−7
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In 2db8d12:
This bound is not necessary. Neither are any of the other bounds you added.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you elaborate on why the bound is not necessary? Can the related issue be solved without adding the bound, or are you referring to bounds other than the one in the
Jetdefinition? If the latter, I added the minimal number of bounds required for the code to compile.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The function worked without the bound -- adding the bound tightens it, but nothing in the function uses the extra bound. Doing this makes the API less useful, not more useful, because it reduces the number of ways you can call these functions.
The PR description claims that it adds a bound to
BitIterbut it does not.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you're referring to the function in the second code block of the issue description, that's pseudocode to illustrate the motivation. The actual implementation uses clones.
BitIteralready derivesClone, so to obtain cloneable iterators, we need to bound the iterator type parameter. Moreover, adding the bound directly toBitIteritself would require a substantial number of changes (possibly all of them) in this codebase, plus changes to the autogeneratedjet::init::files. Sorry if the description was confusing, but this approach seems like the minimal intervention to achieve the issue's goal.If the existing
BitIterAPI provides a way to rewind steps that I somehow missed, please point it out. Otherwise, is the issue's motivation worthy of restricting bounds?