update int

[thedavidmeister]

Motivation

Solution

Checks

By submitting this for review, I'm confirming I've done the following:

• made this PR as small as possible
• unit-tested any new functionality
• linked any relevant issues or PRs
• included screenshots (if this involves a front-end change)

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated an internal dependency reference to the latest version to stay aligned with upstream updates. No functional changes are introduced.
• Bug Fixes
  • None.
• New Features
  • None.
• Refactor
  • None.
• Documentation
  • None.
• Tests
  • None.
• Style
  • None.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Updates the submodule pointer for lib/rain.interpreter.interface from commit eb94f16… to f941041…. No source files or public interfaces in this repository were modified.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Submodule pointer update lib/rain.interpreter.interface	Advance submodule reference from eb94f16 to f941041; no local code or API changes in this repo.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• bump i9r int #38 — Updates the same submodule pointer to a new commit.
• bump int #37 — Submodule commit bump for lib/rain.interpreter.interface.
• bump i9r interface #35 — Adjusts the lib/rain.interpreter.interface submodule reference.

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title Check	❓ Inconclusive	The title "update int" is brief but ambiguous and does not clearly summarize the primary change in this PR; the diff indicates a submodule pointer bump for lib/rain.interpreter.interface with no public API changes, which the title does not communicate. As written it is likely to confuse reviewers and does not provide a useful history entry. Because the title is generic and unclear it is inconclusive whether it reflects the main change.	Please rename the PR to a concise, specific title that identifies the primary change and target. For example: "bump lib/rain.interpreter.interface submodule to f941041a" or "update rain.interpreter.interface submodule". Also update the PR description with the submodule commit, brief rationale, and any testing notes so reviewers can quickly understand the intent.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch 2025-09-16-float

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 71612d2 and 9b6f9c9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• lib/rain.interpreter.interface (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)

• GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-test)
• GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-static)
• GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-legal)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

lib/rain.interpreter.interface (1)

1-1: Verification blocked — submodule commit missing from remote.

git failed with "fatal: remote error: upload-pack: not our ref eb94f16fb5a4b37f99a4815705a182ff2b40675b" for the submodule referenced by lib/rain.interpreter.interface; confirm the old/new SHAs are pushed to the submodule repo (and .gitmodules URL is correct), then re-run the verification script and ensure CI runs git submodule update --init --recursive.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

@coderabbitai assess this PR size classification for the totality of the PR with the following criterias and report it in your comment:

S/M/L PR Classification Guidelines:

This guide helps classify merged pull requests by effort and complexity rather than just line count. The goal is to assess the difficulty and scope of changes after they have been completed.

Small (S)

Characteristics:

• Simple bug fixes, typos, or minor refactoring
• Single-purpose changes affecting 1-2 files
• Documentation updates
• Configuration tweaks
• Changes that require minimal context to review

Review Effort: Would have taken 5-10 minutes

Examples:

• Fix typo in variable name
• Update README with new instructions
• Adjust configuration values
• Simple one-line bug fixes
• Import statement cleanup

Medium (M)

Characteristics:

• Feature additions or enhancements
• Refactoring that touches multiple files but maintains existing behavior
• Breaking changes with backward compatibility
• Changes requiring some domain knowledge to review

Review Effort: Would have taken 15-30 minutes

Examples:

• Add new feature or component
• Refactor common utility functions
• Update dependencies with minor breaking changes
• Add new component with tests
• Performance optimizations
• More complex bug fixes

Large (L)

Characteristics:

• Major feature implementations
• Breaking changes or API redesigns
• Complex refactoring across multiple modules
• New architectural patterns or significant design changes
• Changes requiring deep context and multiple review rounds

Review Effort: Would have taken 45+ minutes

Examples:

• Complete new feature with frontend/backend changes
• Protocol upgrades or breaking changes
• Major architectural refactoring
• Framework or technology upgrades

Additional Factors to Consider

When deciding between sizes, also consider:

• Test coverage impact: More comprehensive test changes lean toward larger classification
• Risk level: Changes to critical systems bump up a size category
• Team familiarity: Novel patterns or technologies increase complexity

Notes:

• the assessment must be for the totality of the PR, that means comparing the base branch to the last commit of the PR
• the assessment output must be exactly one of: S, M or L (single-line comment) in format of: SIZE={S/M/L}
• do not include any additional text, only the size classification
• your assessment comment must not include tips or additional sections
• do NOT tag me or anyone else on your comment

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

🧩 Analysis chain

SIZE=S

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete diff for PR #41 to assess totality of changes
git fetch origin
git diff origin/main...HEAD --stat
echo "--- Detailed diff ---"
git diff origin/main...HEAD

Length of output: 103

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Try different approaches to see the changes
echo "=== Current branch and status ==="
git branch
git status

echo "=== Recent commits ==="
git log --oneline -5

echo "=== All files in repo ==="
find . -name "*.md" -o -name "*.json" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.ts" -o -name ".gitmodules" | head -20

echo "=== Check submodule status ==="
git submodule status

echo "=== Try using GitHub CLI to get PR diff ==="
gh pr diff 41 || echo "GitHub CLI diff failed"

Length of output: 695

---

SIZE=S